Register
Professional Misconduct

Gerrit Reimers


Address: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Sex: Male
Occupation: Doctor
Date: 4 November 2003


Details



Dr Gerrit Reimers was reprimanded on 4 November 2003 by a Medical Tribunal.


The Health Care Complaints Commission, level 4, 28-36 Foveaux Street, Surrey Hills, 2010, having consulted with the New South Wales Medical Board in accordance with s 52 (1) of the Medical Practice Act 1992 (the Act) as amended complains that: Dr Gerrit Reimers, Medical Practitioner, of P.O. Box 584 2119 in the State of New South Wales (the Practitioner) being a medical practitioner registered under the Act,


COMPLAINT 1


Is guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct and/or professional misconduct within the meaning of s 36 and s 37 of the Act in that he has demonstrated a lack of adequate knowledge, skill, judgement and/or care in the practice of medicine and/or is guilty of unethical or improper conduct relating to the practice of medicine.


COMPLAINT 2


Is guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct and/or professional misconduct within the meaning of s 36 and s 37 of the Act in that he has demonstrated a lack of adequate knowledge, skill, judgement and/or care in the practice of medicine and/or is guilty of unethical or improper conduct relating to the practice of medicine.


COMPLAINT 3


Is guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct and/or professional misconduct within the meaning of s 36 and s 37 of the Act in that he has demonstrated a lack of adequate knowledge, skill, judgement and/ or care in the practice of medicine and/or is guilty of unethical or improper conduct relating to the practice of medicine.


COMPLAINT 4


Is guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct and/or professional misconduct within the meaning of s 36 and s 37 of the Act in that he has demonstrated a lack of adequate knowledge, skill, judgement and/ or care in the practice of medicine and/or is guilty of unethical or improper conduct relating to the practice of medicine.


COMPLAINT 5


Is guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct and/or professional misconduct within the meaning of s 36 and s 37 of the Act in that he has demonstrated a lack of adequate knowledge, skill, judgement and/ or care in the practice of medicine and/or is guilty of unethical or improper conduct relating to the practice of medicine.


COMPLAINT 6


Is guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct and/or professional misconduct within the meaning of s 36 and s 37 of the Act in that he has demonstrated a lack of adequate knowledge, skill, judgement and/ or care in the practice of medicine and/or is guilty of unethical or improper conduct relating to the practice of medicine.


COMPLAINT 7


Is guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct and/or professional misconduct within the meaning of s 36 and s 37 of the Act in that he has demonstrated a lack of adequate knowledge, skill, judgement and/ or care in the practice of medicine.


COMPLAINT 8


Is guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct and/or professional misconduct within the meaning of s 36 and s 37 of the Act in that he has demonstrated a lack of adequate knowledge, skill, judgement and/ or care in the practice of medicine and/or is guilty of unethical or improper conduct relating to the practice of medicine.


COMPLAINT 9


Is guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct and/or professional misconduct within the meaning of s 36 and s 37 of the Act in that he has demonstrated a lack of adequate knowledge, skill, judgement and/ or care in the practice of medicine and/or is guilty of unethical or improper conduct relating to the practice of medicine.


COMPLAINT 10


Is guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct and/or professional misconduct within the meaning of s 36 and s 37 of the Act in that he has demonstrated a lack of adequate knowledge, skill, judgement and/ or care in the practice of medicine and/or is guilty of unethical or improper conduct relating to the practice of medicine.


COMPLAINT 11


Is guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct and/or professional misconduct within the meaning of s 36 and s 37 of the Act in that he has demonstrated a lack of adequate knowledge, skill, judgement and/ or care in the practice of medicine and/or is guilty of unethical or improper conduct relating to the practice of medicine.


COMPLAINT 12


Suffers from an impairment within the meaning of clause 3 of the Dictionary to the Act.


The Tribunal made the following findings and orders:


1. That Dr Reimers is guilty of professional misconduct.


2. That the name of Dr Reimers be removed from the Register of Medical Practitioners.


3. That there be no application for review for 10 years from today.


4. That Dr Reimers pay the costs of HCCC.


5. Exhibits may be returned.